concessioni creditizie o assegnazioni di riserve? (credit facilities or reserve allotments?)
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #132 of 184 articles by views in journal of plant resources and environment
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 184 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
In the international discussions on a contingency plan for the creation of “international liquidity”, the most controversial question has been whether extension of credit facilities or deliberate creation and distribution of reserve units would be the better solution. While some of the experts are indifferent, others are zealous partisans of one of the proposed alternatives. However, most seem willing to accept the proposal which is likely to gain unanimous consent. What is more, changes in the official positions of the participating governments have been frequent and drastic. The present article provides a detailed analysis of the debate of credit facilities vs reserve allotments, highlighting the key related issues. It is argued that the best performance with regard to non-discrimination - the credit facilities approach - would be associated with the worst performance regarding permanence in the existence of monetary reserves, required for a steady growth in world trade and production.
JEL: F33, F34
| Reference Key |
machlup2014monetaconcessioni
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;F. MACHLUP |
| Journal | journal of plant resources and environment |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.