comparison of tibial bone coverage of 6 knee prostheses: a magnetic resonance imaging study with controlled rotation

Clicks: 376
ID: 150050
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #2 of 12 articles by views in journal of the marine biological association of the united kingdom

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Purpose. To compare the extent of tibial bone covered by the tibial tray in 6 most commonly used total knee arthroplasty designs in order to strike a balance between mediolateral cortical fit and optimal tibial component rotation. Methods. In 74 men and 27 women aged 17 to 60 (mean, 32) years with suspected soft-tissue injuries, their magnetic resonance images of the knee in full extension were superimposed with scans of the tibial trays of the 6 designs (one asymmetric and 5 symmetric). The tibial coverage by the tray and any posterolateral/posteromedial overhang/underhang were measured. Results. All 6 tray designs achieved tibial bone coverage of over 80%. Only 28% of all trays achieved optimal posterolateral fit, whereas 49% had posterolateral overhang enough to cause popliteal tendon impingement. Although the asymmetric tray provided highest tibial coverage (88%), its rates of relative and absolute posterolateral and posteromedial overhang were also highest (64%). Conclusion. The asymmetric tray provided improved tibial coverage at the expense of posterolateral and posteromedial overhang of the tibial tray.
Reference Key
wernecke2012journalcomparison Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Gregory C Wernecke;Ian A Harris;Michael TW Houang;Bradley G Seeto;Darren B Chen;Samuel J MacDessi
Journal journal of the marine biological association of the united kingdom
Year 2012
DOI
10.1177/230949901202000201
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.