incidence of bleb-associated endophthalmitis in the united states
Clicks: 160
ID: 149595
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
160 views
22 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #155 of 271 articles by views in e3s web of conferences
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 271 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Kamyar Vaziri,1 Krishna Kishor,1 Stephen G Schwartz,1 Arindel S Maharaj,1 Darius M Moshfeghi,2 Andrew A Moshfeghi,3 Harry W Flynn Jr1 1Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA; 3USC Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA Purpose: To evaluate the 5-year incidence rate of blebitis and bleb-associated endophthalmitis in the United States. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we utilized a large commercial health insurance claim-based database during 2007–2011 and identified all patients who had a record of trabeculectomy in 2007. These patients were followed until the end of 2011. During the follow-up period, all incidences of blebitis, confirmed bleb-associated endophthalmitis, and presumed bleb-associated endophthalmitis were recorded. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was utilized to calculate 5-year cumulative incidence rates of blebitis and bleb-associated endophthalmitis following trabeculectomy procedures. Results: Among the 1,461 trabeculectomies included in our analysis, eight cases of blebitis, five cases of confirmed bleb-associated endophthalmitis, and eight cases of presumed bleb-associated endophthalmitis were identified. We found that the 5-year cumulative incidence of blebitis was 0.55%±0.19%. The 5-year cumulative incidence of bleb-associated endophthalmitis was 0.45%±0.2% when only confirmed cases were included and 1.3%±0.34% when presumed cases were also added to the analysis. The mean time from procedure to diagnosis was 45 months for blebitis and 33 months for bleb-associated endophthalmitis. Conclusion: Blebitis and bleb-related endophthalmitis are uncommon in the United States. The 5-year cumulative incidence was 0.55% for blebitis and 0.45%–1.3% for bleb-associated endophthalmitis. Keywords: bleb, blebitis, bleb-associated endophthalmitis, trabeculectomy
| Reference Key |
k2015clinicalincidence
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Vaziri K;Kishor K;Schwartz SG;Maharaj AS;Moshfeghi DM;Moshfeghi AA;Flynn HW Jr |
| Journal | e3s web of conferences |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.