complex underdetermination and the units of clinical translation
Clicks: 225
ID: 149306
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
3.3
/100
11 views
11 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
What makes a high-quality biomarker experiment? The success of personalized medicine hinges on the answer to this question. Unfortunately, as many commentators have now emphasized, the quality of most biomarker experiments to date has been quite low. Although the technical side of this problem has received considerable attention, the philosophical issues remain largely unexplored. In this paper, I argue that understanding what constitutes a high-quality biomarker experiment requires some fundamental shifts in how we think about the epistemology, ontology, and methodology of clinical translation.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (84 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
hey2015theoriacomplex
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Spencer Phillips Hey |
| Journal | central european journal of biology |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.1387/theoria.12697
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.