erros de anotações na elaboração de índices de produção em granjas industriais de suínos no sul do brasil the human effect on data collection of birth-related production indices in brazilian swine industrial farms
Clicks: 269
ID: 149100
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
269 views
33 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #110 of 276 articles by views in Environmental research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 276 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Foram realizadas observações em quatro granjas de suinocultura industrial nas 24 horas do dia, registrando-se o número de fetos mumificados, de natimortos, de nascidos vivos e total segundo as observações feitas por funcionários da granja (FUN) e por pesquisadores (AO). Foram também registrados resultados de um número semelhante de anotações das mesmas características no período imediatamente anterior à pesquisa, obtidas dos relatórios das granjas. Verificaram-se diferenças entre as avaliações dos FUN e dos AO quanto aos registros dos mumificados e total de nascidos em todas as granjas (P<0,05). A diferença no número de natimortos ocorreu em três granjas (P<0,05) e de nascidos vivos em apenas uma (P<0,05). Os percentuais máximos de mumificados, de natimortos, de nascidos vivos e total não registrados pelos FUN foram 67,8%, 34,5%, 1,8% e 5,1%, respectivamente. Os percentuais máximos das mesmas características não registrados pelos FUN no período imediatamente anterior à pesquisa foram 70,4%, 82,1%, 10,5% e 16,5%.
Observational studies were carried out in four industrial swine farms. The observations were performed on a 24 hours basis and mummified fetuses, stillborn and born alive piglets were recorded by observers (OB) and by employees (EM). In all farms, it was also obtained a retrospective data previous to the observational study period, comprising the same number of farrowings. Differences among mummified fetuses and total born piglets recorded by OB and EM in all farms (P<0.05) were observed. The recorded number of stillborn piglets differed between OB and EM in three farms (P<0.05) and the number of born alive piglets in one unit (P<0.05). In all farms during the analysis period, the maximal percentage of recorded mummified fetuses, stillborn, born alive and total born piglets, were 67.8%, 34.5%, 1.8% and 5.1%, respectively. The comparison of retrospective and EM data showed a maximal percentage of not recorded mummified fetuses, stillborn, born alive and total born piglets by EM of 70.4%, 82.1%, 10.5% e 16.5%, respectively. These errors can induce to a wrong interpretation of the farm data and the efforts to maximize the productivity could be directed to other sectors than the farrowing house.
Observational studies were carried out in four industrial swine farms. The observations were performed on a 24 hours basis and mummified fetuses, stillborn and born alive piglets were recorded by observers (OB) and by employees (EM). In all farms, it was also obtained a retrospective data previous to the observational study period, comprising the same number of farrowings. Differences among mummified fetuses and total born piglets recorded by OB and EM in all farms (P<0.05) were observed. The recorded number of stillborn piglets differed between OB and EM in three farms (P<0.05) and the number of born alive piglets in one unit (P<0.05). In all farms during the analysis period, the maximal percentage of recorded mummified fetuses, stillborn, born alive and total born piglets, were 67.8%, 34.5%, 1.8% and 5.1%, respectively. The comparison of retrospective and EM data showed a maximal percentage of not recorded mummified fetuses, stillborn, born alive and total born piglets by EM of 70.4%, 82.1%, 10.5% e 16.5%, respectively. These errors can induce to a wrong interpretation of the farm data and the efforts to maximize the productivity could be directed to other sectors than the farrowing house.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (98 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
schneider2004arquivoerros
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;L.G. Schneider;F.P. Bortolozzo;I. Wentz;G. Borchardt Neto |
| Journal | Environmental research |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0102-09352004000100013
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.