phenomenological community and integrative social agency: critique of a phenomenological concept of inter-subjectivity
Clicks: 272
ID: 148286
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
272 views
41 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #36 of 87 articles by views in Plants (Basel, Switzerland)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The term „phenomenological community“ is not among the most well-known
concepts of phenomenology. It was used by Marc Richir referring to
Merleau-Ponty’s concept of „natural“ community. The paper examines this
concept from the point of view of social philosophy. It analyses its
relevance in the context of a post-Hegelian philosophy of inter-subjectivity.
The community conceived this way is origin and result at the same time,
giving rise to a theory of a historically grounded formation of a previously
not given and heterogeneous communicative integration; moreover, social
mediation defining the subject of action is an open, non-totalizing process,
which makes it possible to conceptualize an integrative action that does not
neutralize the heterogeneity of the contemporary society. The theory of the
phenomenological community is the ontology of a disintegrated but common
world. Social action never happens on the basis of chaos but of the
inter-subjective world, thus it can provide a new basis for such an action.
On the other hand the „phenomenological community“ is essentially a form of
the „passive synthesis“ thus it is unable to provide foundation for a
unifying action, the only possibility for an authentic integration (a
non-representative form of social integration). Thus it necessitates a
critique.
| Reference Key |
zsolt2014filozofijaphenomenological
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Bagi Zsolt |
| Journal | Plants (Basel, Switzerland) |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.2298/FID1402005B
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.