poor adherence to tranexamic acid guidelines for adult, injured patients presenting to a district, public, south african hospital
Clicks: 228
ID: 147362
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
228 views
35 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #18 of 48 articles by views in advances in optoelectronics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Introduction: In South Africa’s high injury prevalent setting, it is imperative that injury mortality is kept to a minimum. The CRASH-2 trial showed that Tranexamic acid (TXA) in severe injury reduces mortality. Implementation of this into injury protocols has been slow despite the evidence. The 2013 Western Cape Emergency Medicine Guidelines adopted the use of TXA. This study aims to describe compliance.
Methods: A retrospective study of TXA use in adult injury patients presenting to Khayelitsha Hospital was done. A sample of 301 patients was randomly selected from Khayelitsha’s resuscitation database and data were supplemented through chart review. The primary endpoint was compliance with local guidance: systolic blood pressure <90 or heart rate >110 or a significant risk of haemorrhage. Injury Severity Score (ISS) was used as a proxy for the latter. ISS >16 was interpreted as high risk of haemorrhage and ISS <8 as low risk. Linear regression and Fischer’s Exact test were used to explore assumptions.
Results: Overall compliance was 58% (172 of 295). For those without an indication, this was 96% (172 of 180). Of the 115 patients who had an indication, only eight (18%) received the first dose of TXA and none received a follow-up infusion. Compliance with the protocol was significantly better if an indication for TXA did not exist, compared to when one did (p < 0.001). Increased TXA use was associated only with ISS >15 (p < 0.001).
Discussion: TXA is not used in accordance with local guidelines. It was as likely not to be used when indicated than when not indicated. Reasons for this are multifactorial and likely include stock levels, lack of administration equipment, time to reach definitive care, poor documentation and hesitancy to use. Further investigation is needed to understand the barriers to administration.
| Reference Key |
wiese2017africanpoor
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Jacobus G.G. Wiese;Daniël J. van Hoving;Luke Hunter;Sa'ad Lahri;Stevan R. Bruijns |
| Journal | advances in optoelectronics |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.afjem.2017.04.006
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.