the comparison of minocycline oral-rinse and gel on pocket depth

Clicks: 174
ID: 147353
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #86 of 127 articles by views in industrial crops and products

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 127 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

Background: Infection disease is still considered as a prominent disease in many developing countries, like Indonesia. The most oral infection disease is periodontitis. Despite scaling and root planning as the main therapy, minocycline as adjunct therapy has already been used for periodontitis. There are a lot of media used, such as oral rinse and gel. Many researches even have also shown that the use of minocycline as adjunct therapy can decrease inflammation in periodontitis. Like tetracycline, minocycline as an anti inflammatory and anticollagenase is also considered to be very effective for the treatment of periodontitis. Media of minocycline that are available are gel, fiber, and oral rinse, as the newest one. Purpose: The purpose of this research is to examine the comparison of 0.2% oral rinse minocycline and 2% minocycline gel to reduce the pocket depth. Method: The samples were divided into two groups, the first group using oral rinse and the second one using gel after scaling. Result: There was no statistically significant difference between the group with minocycline gel and oral rinse. Conclusion: The application of 2% minocycline gel or 0.2% minocycline mouth wash after scaling and root planning has the same effect in reducing pocket depth.

Latar belakang: Penyakit infeksi masih merupakan kasus yang menonjol di banyak negara berkembang, seperti Indonesia. Infeksi rongga mulut yang banyak terjadi adalah periodontitis. Selain terapi utama yaitu skeling dan root planning, menggunakan minosiklin sebagai terapi tambahan telah banyak digunakan, seperti obat kumur dan gel. Banyak penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan minosiklin sebagai terapi tambahan dapat menurunkan keradangan pada pasien periodontitis. Seperti tetrasiklin, minosiklin sebagai anti keradangan dan anti kolagenase, sangat efektif sebagai perawatan periodontitis. Media minosiklin yang banyak digunakan di antaranya yaitu gel, fiber, dan obat kumur yang terbaru. Tujuan: Tujuan penelitian adalah mengetahui perbandingan antara penggunaan 0,2% obat kumur minosiklin dan 2% minosiklin gel untuk mengurangi kedalaman poketperiodontal. Metode: Sampel dibagi menjadi dua grup, grup pertama menggunakan obat kumur, dan kelompok kedua menggunakan gel, setelah terapi skeling. Hasil: Tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara kelompok minosiklin obat kumur dan gel. Kesimpulan: Minosiklin gel dan obat kumur sama-sama efektif dalam mengurangi kedalaman poket.

Reference Key
augustina2010dentalthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Eka Fitria Augustina
Journal industrial crops and products
Year 2010
DOI
10.20473/j.djmkg.v43.i1.p21-25
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.