comparison of analytical model of springback angle of composite plate with measurement with and without recrystallization effect

Clicks: 203
ID: 146910
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #6 of 9 articles by views in tourism analysis

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Presented paper deals with comparison of two measurements done in our lab to achieve the value of the springback angle of composite plate with single curvature. Plate consists of carbon fiber and PPS matrix. Springback angle without recrystallization effect was measured earlier with the use of laser profilometer ScanControl LLT 2800-25 and optical distance measurement CHRocodile M4. Springback angle with recrystallization effect was measured later with the use of Fibre Bragg Grating optical sensor (FBG) and image processing. Results were compared with an analytical solution in developed software “Springback” with achieving good agreements.
Reference Key
padovec2013transactionscomparison Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Zdeněk PADOVEC;Milan DVOŘÁK;Milan RŮŽIČKA
Journal tourism analysis
Year 2013
DOI
10.22223/tr.2013-1/1936
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.