comparison of analytical model of springback angle of composite plate with measurement with and without recrystallization effect
Clicks: 203
ID: 146910
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
203 views
20 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #6 of 9 articles by views in tourism analysis
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Presented paper deals with comparison of two measurements done in our lab to achieve the value of the springback angle of composite plate with single curvature. Plate consists of carbon fiber and PPS matrix. Springback angle without recrystallization effect was measured earlier with the use of laser profilometer ScanControl LLT 2800-25 and optical distance measurement CHRocodile M4. Springback angle with recrystallization effect was measured later with the use of Fibre Bragg Grating optical sensor (FBG) and image processing. Results were compared with an analytical solution in developed software “Springback” with achieving good agreements.
| Reference Key |
padovec2013transactionscomparison
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Zdeněk PADOVEC;Milan DVOŘÁK;Milan RŮŽIČKA |
| Journal | tourism analysis |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.22223/tr.2013-1/1936
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.