sealing type effect on corn silage quality in bunker silos
Clicks: 185
ID: 146902
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
185 views
14 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #308 of 436 articles by views in Trials
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 436 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Forage conservation in silos depends on the efficiency of silo sealing, among other factors, to minimize aerobic deterioration and consequent qualitative and quantitative losses in silage. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of two sealing types on dry matter recovery rate, aerobic stability, nutritional composition, and in vitro digestibility of corn silage in bunker silos: 110-µm-thick double-sided polyethylene sealing (conventional sealing) and110-µm-thick double-sided polyethylene sealing superimposed on 111-µm-thick translucent polyethylene sealing (double sealing). There were no significant differences in nutritional composition of silages between conventional and double sealing. However, the double sealing system was more efficient (P<0.05) in maintaining lower silo temperatures (30.48°C vs. 31.18°C), in dry matter recovery (88.79% vs. 85.64%), and increased in vitro neutral-detergent fiber digestibility (33.04% vs. 24.6%), when compared to the conventional version.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (108 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
neumanncinciasealing
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Mikael Neumann;Guilherme Fernando Mattos Leão;Eloize Jaqueline Askel;Fabiano Marafon;Danúbia Nogueira Figueira;Mailson Poczynek |
| Journal | Trials |
| Year | Year not found |
| DOI |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20160643
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.