problematic mpr decree post reform and after the issuance of law no. 12 of 2011

Clicks: 187
ID: 146311
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The existence of Tap. MPR Post 1945 Amandement to the issuance of Law No. 12 of 2011 has given an opportunity for the Assembly to create a new Tap. MPR outside from the valid one. At the time how judicial review of laws that conflict with the Tap. MPR, and how judicial review of the Tap. MPR are contrary to the Constitution is necessary to realize justice and balance. One of the powers of the Constitutional Court (MK) in paragraph C of Article 24 (1) Constitution of 1945 is hear at the first and the last with a final decision to the laws of Constitution. So if there are laws that conflict with the MPR or MPR and contrary to the Constitution, the authority to test the authority of the Constitutional Court instead. How To Cite: Wijaya, S. (2015). Problematic MPR Decree Post Reform and After The Issuance of Law No. 12 of 2011. Rechtsidee, 2(1), 53-64. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v2i1.6
Reference Key
wijaya2015rechtsideeproblematic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Sulardi Wijaya
Journal rechtsidee
Year 2015
DOI
10.21070/jihr.v2i1.6
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.