pemodelan efisiensi bank di indonesia: perbandingan antara bank syariah dan bank konvensional

Clicks: 257
ID: 145928
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #8 of 27 articles by views in omega (united kingdom)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

Modeling of Indonesian Banks' Efficiency: Comparative Study Between Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks

This study aims to analyze the efficiency comparison between Islamic banks and conventional banks in Indonesia in 2012-2014. The method used in this study is non-parametric approach with data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Panel data regression whereas input and output variables are treated in intermediary function. To measure the efficiency level of Islamic banks and conventional banks the independent sample t test is used. The result of the study shows that there is significant difference of efficiency between Islamic banking and conventional banking in 2012-2014. The empirical factors that affect Islamic banks and Conventional banks efficiency are ROA, CAR, and FDR variables. On the other hand, NPF results insignificantly and affects negatively towards Islamic banks efficiency. Lastly, ROA, NPL, LDR, and CAR had significantly affected Conventional banks efficiency.

DOI: 10.15408/ess.v7i2.4989

 

Reference Key
ramly2017esensi:pemodelan Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Ar Royyan Ramly;Abdul Hakim
Journal omega (united kingdom)
Year 2017
DOI
10.15408/ess.v7i2.4989
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.