numerical modelling of mechanical behavior of coal mining hard roofs in different backfill ratios: a case study

Clicks: 191
ID: 145772
2017
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #282 of 526 articles by views in acs combinatorial science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 526 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
In coal mining hard roofs are one of the main factors causing the occurrence of rock bursts in working panels. To solve this problem, the solid backfill coal mining (SBCM) technique is proposed and used as an effective measure to prevent the rock bursts induced by hard roofs. However, due to the different backfill ratios of working planes, the control effects on hard roofs are quite unique. By using a numerical simulation, this study simulates the deformation of hard roofs and distributions of stress and strain energies in different roof-control backfill ratios, so as to reveal the control mechanisms of SBCM on hard roofs. The results show that, when the roof-controlled backfill ratio are 0, 40% and 60%, the ratio exerts no influence on the distributions of advanced abutment stress and strain energies. While for roof-control backfill ratios of 82.5%, 91% and 93%, the advanced abutment stress and strain energies decrease significantly, but the increment of the ratio exerts little influence on the decrease. When the roof-control backfill ratio reaches 97%, the advanced abutment stress and strain energies again decrease. In this context, the stress concentration factor is only 1.5 and the peak strain energy is 544 kJ/m3, the stress concentration factor and peak strain energy decrease by 45.7% and 63.9%, respectively, compared with the caving method. As the roof-controlled backfill ratio rises, backfill materials tend to support hard roofs, thus significantly preventing dynamic hazards.
Reference Key
li2017energiesnumerical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Meng Li;Nan Zhou;Jixiong Zhang;Zhicheng Liu
Journal acs combinatorial science
Year 2017
DOI
10.3390/en10071005
URL
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/1005
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.