what’s wrong and what’s right with geography education in the usa?

Clicks: 241
ID: 145429
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Geographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international competitiveness and decision-making. This paper reviews factors leading to deficiencies in US Geography Education, including lack of emphasis compared with subjects more prominently tested, teacher preparation and in-service training, curricula design, and high student mobility rates. We also review positive trends, including developing more rigorous sets of learning standards and geographic skills, and support from interested organizations and State educational agencies for encouraging student interest and participation in assessments and contests. We examine selective resources for teaching and learning geographic concepts and skills, many available online from federal and nongovernmental agencies. Finally, we consider the potential for learning geography through such informal science education venues as museums and mass media.
Reference Key
passow2017revistawhats Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Michael J. Passow
Journal microbial genomics
Year 2017
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.