mandato resocializador de las penas privativas de libertad y permisos de salida penitenciarios.

Clicks: 295
ID: 145352
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #6 of 11 articles by views in thinking skills and creativity

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Article 25.2 of the Spanish Constitution of 1978 prescribes the guidance of the imprisonment penalties towards the rehabilitation and social reintegration, conferring therefore constitutional relevance to the foundations and limits of the exercise of “ius puniendi” (right to punish) by the State. First of all this essay aims to offer a general approach to the issues concerning the rehabilitation and reintegration order of the imprisonment penalties in the context of the limiting action of the State power during the complete punishment process. As well as analyze the meaning of the exit furloughs established by the penitentiary legislation to satisfy the constitutional mandate of reintegration of the punished.
Reference Key
aguilar2014revistamandato Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Isabel CASANOVA AGUILAR
Journal thinking skills and creativity
Year 2014
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.