ciência e reconstrução em saúde: disrupção e provisoriedade como possibilidades emancipatórias science and reconstruction in health: rupture and temporary as possibilities emancipation
Clicks: 220
ID: 145177
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
220 views
30 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #133 of 292 articles by views in journal of physical activity & health
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 292 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
O reordenamento de desigualdades sociais a partir do conhecimento pode vir a se constituir uma utopia fundada na democratização de saberes e práticas se tal saber se reveste na provisoriedade emancipatória. Tendo por foco a discussão atual sobre ciência e pós-modernidade, captando principalmente o caráter inovador da polêmica, este estudo aprofunda reflexões teóricas sobre as possibilidades participativas e democratizantes inerentes ao ato de conhecer. Na primeira parte são tecidas críticas ao paradigma moderno da ciência, sobretudo ao caráter limitador da forma como ela compreende e intervém na realidade. Num segundo momento, articula-se conhecimento e disrupção como substratos da emancipação de sujeitos. Na terceira parte, conclusiva e articuladora, propõe-se alguns critérios de cientificidade calcados na discussão tecida nos tópicos anteriores, indicando possibilidades libertárias à ciência no setor saúde. O conhecimento por qual se luta estaria pautado na utopia de democratizar saberes a partir do reconhecimento da provisoriedade das certezas científicas.
The decrease of social differences through knowledge may turn into a utopia founded on the democratization of theories and practices, if it is covered by temporary emancipation. Focusing on the current discussion about science and post-modernity and capturing mainly the innovative character of this controversy, this study deepens theoretical reflections on the participative and democratizing possibilities inherent to the action of knowing. In the first part, the modern paradigm of science is criticized, above all the limiting character in which it sees and intervenes with reality. In a second moment, knowledge and rupture are seen as substrata of the emancipation of subjects. In the third part, conclusive and articulate, some criteria of scientificity dealt with in the previous topics are proposed, indicating libertarian possibilities to science at health sector. The knowledge for which one struggles would be ruled in the utopia of democratizing it, starting from the recognition of how temporary scientific certainties are.
The decrease of social differences through knowledge may turn into a utopia founded on the democratization of theories and practices, if it is covered by temporary emancipation. Focusing on the current discussion about science and post-modernity and capturing mainly the innovative character of this controversy, this study deepens theoretical reflections on the participative and democratizing possibilities inherent to the action of knowing. In the first part, the modern paradigm of science is criticized, above all the limiting character in which it sees and intervenes with reality. In a second moment, knowledge and rupture are seen as substrata of the emancipation of subjects. In the third part, conclusive and articulate, some criteria of scientificity dealt with in the previous topics are proposed, indicating libertarian possibilities to science at health sector. The knowledge for which one struggles would be ruled in the utopia of democratizing it, starting from the recognition of how temporary scientific certainties are.
| Reference Key |
pires2004cinciacincia
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Maria Raquel Gomes Maia Pires |
| Journal | journal of physical activity & health |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S1413-81232004000200022
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.