researches on the productive effect of a lipid absorption improver, used in broilers feeding

Clicks: 192
ID: 144201
2007
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #147 of 249 articles by views in Enzyme and microbial technology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 249 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
According to the researches results, the chickens within the experimental groups performed better values for the live weight gain and for the feed conversion rate, as compared to those in the control group. Economically speaking, the revenue was 2,30-7,35% higher in the E2 group, which yield the best production parameters (highest live weight and lowest FCR), than those obtained by the chickens in the other studied groups.The best performances, considering all the parameters, were observed in E2 group, which received a concentration of 500 g feed additive (LB)/tone of mixed fodder, in order to improve the lipids absorption rate in chickens gut.
Reference Key
pop2007scientificresearches Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;I.M. POP;D. SIMEANU
Journal Enzyme and microbial technology
Year 2007
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.