the status and meaning of criminal procedure: an exploration of the reception of dna evidence in the criminal process
Clicks: 242
ID: 143680
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
242 views
45 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #4 of 6 articles by views in sibirskij onkologičeskij Žurnal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2013, pp. 63–74.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (4 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
aarli2013bergenthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Ragna Aarli |
| Journal | sibirskij onkologičeskij Žurnal |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.15845/bjclcj.v1i1.524
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.