what about clonidine for diarrhoea? a systematic review and meta-analysis of its effect in humans
Clicks: 355
ID: 142744
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
8.4
/100
28 views
28 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Background: Clonidine is considered an alternative treatment for refractory diarrhoea. The evidence in the literature is scarce and not conclusive. The present paper’s purpose is to gather available evidence and provide a systematic answer regarding the effectiveness of clonidine for diarrhoea. Method: We performed a systematic review of clonidine and its effect on diarrhoea. Meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model of the standardized mean difference (SMD) or the weighted mean difference and heterogeneity was quantified with I 2 and publication bias was assessed with Egger’s and Begg’s test. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to investigate sources of heterogeneity. Any empirical study describing use of clonidine for diarrhoea in humans independent of age was included. For the meta-analysis, papers had to provide sufficient data to produce an effect measure, while case reports were not included in the meta-analysis and are discussed narratively only. Results: A total of 24 trials and seven case reports were identified. Clonidine (median dose 300 μg/day) has been used for treatment of diarrhoea in irritable bowel syndrome, faecal incontinence, diabetes, withdrawal-associated diarrhoea, intestinal failure, neuroendocrine tumours and cholera; studies were also performed on healthy volunteers. Results indicate a strong effect of clonidine on diarrhoea (SMD = −1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.46 to −0.58) with a decrease of stool volume by 0.97 l/day, stool frequency by 0.4 times/day and increase in transit time by 31 minutes. In a sensitivity analysis of studies with functional diarrhoea and sample size over 10 subjects, the effect was similar −0.99 (95% CI −1.54 to −0.43). There is however significant heterogeneity and publication bias. Heterogeneity decreased in subgroup analyses by condition but not with other factors examined. A limitation of the present study includes small study effects. Conclusion: Clonidine is effective for treatment of diarrhoea and should be considered as an alternative when all other medications have failed.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (299 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
fragkos2016therapeuticwhat
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Konstantinos C. Fragkos;Natalia Zárate-Lopez;Christos C. Frangos |
| Journal | sosyal güvence dergisi |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1177/1756283X15625586
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.