management of benign laryngotracheal stenosis – a 5-year experience of indian tertiary care setup

Cliques: 333
ID: 142528
2018
Metricas de Qualidade e Desempenho do Artigo
Qualidade Geral
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Avaliacao de Qualidade por IA
Nao analisado
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #5 of 14 articles by views in open chemistry

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Resumo
Introduction: Laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) implies a partial or complete cicatricial narrowing of the larynx and/or trachea. Surgical management is technically challenging owing to complex anatomy and delicate nature of airway structures. The present study aims to study clinical profile, management, and surgical outcome of LTS in a tertiary care setup of India. Materials and Methods: All patients with LTS treated between 2011 and 2016 were included in this study. They underwent endoscopic assessment followed by definitive management which included endoscopic and external surgical techniques. The success of treatment was defined by decannulation, acceptable voice quality, and glottic competence. Results: A total of 106 patients with benign LTS were treated. Prolonged intubation was the single largest cause (70.7%). Tracheal stenosis formed the largest group (43.4%) followed by subglottic stenosis (26.4%). About 37.7% of patients underwent endoscopic management. Among external approaches, 32.07% of patients underwent resection-anastomosis surgeries including partial cricotracheal resection (PCTR) and tracheal resection with end-to-end anastomosis. Nearly 12.3% ofpatients underwent various forms of laryngotracheoplasties. About 7.5% of patients underwent both in the form of extended- PCTR or reconstruction surgery followed by resection-anastomosis. Nearly 7.5% of patients required Montgomery T-tube insertion while three underwent hyo-epiglottopexy for laryngomalacia. A total of 100 patients (94.3%) have been successfully decannulated. Conclusions: The use of appropriate size, low pressure cuffed tubes, and early tracheostomy will go a long way in preventing LTS. The precise assessment of laryngotracheal complex is the cornerstone of management. Choice of treatment depends on location, severity, and length of stenosis, as well as on patient comorbidities, history of previous interventions, and expertise of the surgical team. Goal of any treatment modality should be to achieve a patent airway, glottic competence and acceptable voice quality.
Chave de Referencia
dabholkar2018journalmanagement Use esta chave para citacao automatica no manuscrito ao usar SciMatic Gerenciador de Manuscritos ou Gerenciador de Teses
Autores ;Jyoti Dabholkar;Arpit Sharma;Nitish Virmani;Harsh Dhar
Periodico open chemistry
Ano 2018
DOI
10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_17_18
URL
Palavras-chave

Citacoes

Nenhuma citacao encontrada. Para adicionar uma citacao, entre em contato com o administrador em info@scimatic.org

Nenhum comentario ainda. Seja o primeiro a comentar neste artigo.