levantamento brucÉlico da bacia leiteira de goiÂnia ring-test survey of brucellosis in the goiÂnia dairy basin ring-test

Clicks: 138
ID: 142086
2007
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #31 of 41 articles by views in chemical engineering and technology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
<!-- @page { margin: 2cm } --> <p class="western" align="justify">Foram analisadas pelo Ring-Test 1.346 amostras de leite, provenientes de 960 propriedades da bacia leiteira de Goiânia, no período das secas e 2.548 amostras provenientes de 1.188 propriedades no período das águas. A análise estatística dos resultados do índice de brucelose medido nos dois períodos mostra uma diferença significativa entre os mesmos. A bibliografia consultada não indicou nenhuma referência a resultados, obtidos pelo Ring-Test, que revelassem diferenças significativas entre os períodos secos e das águas. A interpretação desses resultados, à luz da metodologia, pode repousar numa das duas hipóteses seguintes: 1º — Introdução de novos animais no fornecimento de leite, animais estes não integrados no processo da lactação no período das águas. Este fator deve-se a uma série de fatores de ordem econômica que levam os fornecedores de leite a esse procedimento. 2º — Erros experimentais inerentes ao sistema de coletas devido a mudanças de procedimento durante a realização do trabalho.</p>
<!-- @page { margin: 2cm } --> <p class="western" align="justify">1346 milk samples from 960 farms, which provide milk for Goiânia, have been analysed during the dry season, and 2548 samples from 1186 farms, during the rainy season, by the Ring-Test. The statistic analysis of the Brucellosis rate results found during the two periods have shown a significant difference between them. The bibliographic revision has not presented any reference to results gotten by the Ring-Test which might enable the presentation of significant differences between the dry and rainy seasons. These results can be interpreted under two points of view: lst - The introduction of new milk productor animals, which have not been employed for this purpose during the rainy season. This is due to several economic factors which lead the milk furnishers to this procedure. 2nd - Experimental errors inherent to the collection and examination methods due to changes in procedure during the work, as well as errors in the analysis method employed, caused by the condictions mentioned under the l st item.</p>
Reference Key
trres2007pesquisalevantamento Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Roberto A. Almeida Tôrres;Augusto Silva de Carvalho;Aníbal José Alves Tôrres
Journal chemical engineering and technology
Year 2007
DOI
10.5216/pat.v2i1.1912
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.