intellectual structure of the research in entrepreneurial failure
Clicks: 130
ID: 141214
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
130 views
13 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #22 of 25 articles by views in expert opinion on drug discovery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Inside the discipline of “entrepreneurship”, we intend to approach the state of the art research in the field of “failure entrepreneurship” through analysis of documents dating. Therefore, in this article, in addition to traditional qualitative methods, we use quantitative, bibliometric and social network analysis methods. With them we aim to identify the most cited studies to delineate the key authors and theories that form the intellectual framework of the field of entrepreneurship failure, so that we can describe the relationships among the documents that have a greater impact for the construction of the knowledge
base, identifying critical research issues in the area. The analysis revealed the important boom that this field of “failure” is having within the discipline of “entrepreneurship” and the speed that the studies about it are increasing
base, identifying critical research issues in the area. The analysis revealed the important boom that this field of “failure” is having within the discipline of “entrepreneurship” and the speed that the studies about it are increasing
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (129 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
csero2014faedpymeintellectual
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Juan Carlos Díaz Cásero;Antonio Fernández Portillo;María de la Cruz Sánchez Escobedo;Ricardo María Hernández Mogollón |
| Journal | expert opinion on drug discovery |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.15558/fir.v3i5.57
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.