Variations in external reference pricing implementation: does it matter for public policy?
Clicks: 310
ID: 14032
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
67.4
/100
310 views
217 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #5 of 8 articles by views in the european journal of health economics : hepac : health economics in prevention and care
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
External reference pricing (ERP) seeks to rationalize prices and contain costs using foreign prices as a reference for the determination of domestic prices and is often used as the starting point for the facilitation of negotiations between health authorities and pharmaceutical manufacturers.A systematic literature review was used to identify characteristics of ERP implementation across 29 countries. Primary data collection, in the form of surveys directed at key stakeholders, was also used to supplement data in instances where information received from the systematic literature review was outdated or minimal. Findings from the systematic literature review and primary evidence from key stakeholders were bench-marked against 14 best practice principles inherent to an optimal ERP system.Significant heterogeneity in ERP implementation across countries was identified. Country basket size, pricing calculation, and frequency of price revisions varied between countries. Belgium, France, and South Africa were more likely to adhere to the best practice principles, whilst Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania had the most instances of non-adherence.The observed heterogeneity has policy implications for governments including globally declining pharmaceutical prices, launch delays in lower income countries, reduced incentive for continued R&D, and reduced access to medicines. Overcoming this issue to ensure that ERP is beneficial to all stakeholders will require a focus on developing sustainable, transparent, simple, and stable systems using a set of key guidelines that should maximize the benefits of the pricing policy.
| Reference Key |
gill2019variationsthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Gill, Jennifer;Fontrier, Anna-Maria;Kyriopoulos, Dionysis;Kanavos, Panos; |
| Journal | the european journal of health economics : hepac : health economics in prevention and care |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s10198-019-01100-y
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.