reproductive technologies and genomic selection in cattle
Clicks: 148
ID: 140171
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
148 views
23 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #147 of 168 articles by views in Water research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 168 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The recent development of genomic selection induces dramatic changes in the way genetic selection schemes are to be conducted. This review describes the new context and corresponding needs for genomic based selection schemes and how reproductive technologies can be used to meet those needs. Information brought by reproductive physiology will provide new markers and new improved phenotypes that will increase the efficiency of selection schemes for reproductive traits. In this context, the value of the reproductive techniques including assisted embryo based reproductive technologies (Multiple Ovaluation Embryo Transfer and Ovum pick up associated to in vitro Fertilization) is also revisited. The interest of embryo typing is discussed. The recent results obtained with this emerging technology which are compatible with the use of the last generation of chips for genotype analysis may lead to very promising applications for the breeding industry. The combined use of several embryo based reproductive technologies will probably be more important in the near future to satisfy the needs of genomic selection for increasing the number of candidates and to preserve at the same time genetic variability.
| Reference Key |
humblot2010veterinaryreproductive
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Patrice Humblot;Daniel Le Bourhis;Sebastien Fritz;Jean Jacques Colleau;Cyril Gonzalez;Catherine Guyader Joly;Alain Malafosse;Yvan Heyman;Yves Amigues;Michel Tissier;Claire Ponsart |
| Journal | Water research |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
10.4061/2010/192787
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.