predictions in ungauged basins – where do we stand?

Clicks: 174
ID: 139760
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #23 of 73 articles by views in gruppe interaktion organisation zeitschrift fur angewandte organisationspsychologie

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The spatial dimensions of water management heavily rely on accurate hydrological estimates in the landscape. This has exactly been the focus of the Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) initiative of the IAHS. The initiative has significantly advanced the science by furthering process understanding and estimation methods, and by synthesising the knowledge across processes, places and scales. Ongoing research on PUB is increasingly treating water management as an intrinsic part of the hydrological cycle and is developing processes understanding and methods to account for the feedbacks between humans and water in the landscape.
Reference Key
blschl2016proceedingspredictions Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;G. Blöschl
Journal gruppe interaktion organisation zeitschrift fur angewandte organisationspsychologie
Year 2016
DOI
10.5194/piahs-373-57-2016
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.