the history of archaeology as a ‘colonial discourse’
Clicks: 190
ID: 139228
2006
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
190 views
25 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
During the greater part of the twentieth century, the history of
archaeology promoted an idealized image of archaeological practice in colonized places.
Historians usually omitted the political implications of archaeology and, in many
instances, justified the appropriation of material culture from colonized places. In
this paper, I suggest that postcolonial studies, a field constituted during the 1980s
and 1990s, offers a useful framework in which to understand the relationships between
the history of archaeology and colonialism. Taking postcolonial theory as reference, I
define the history of archaeology written until the 1980s as a particular form of
‘colonial discourse’. I conclude by proposing some ways in which postcolonial theory can
inform the history of archaeology.
| Reference Key |
moro-abada2006bulletinthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Oscar Moro-Abadía |
| Journal | bulletin of the history of archaeology |
| Year | 2006 |
| DOI |
10.5334/bha.16202
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.