substorms during different storm phases
Clicks: 189
ID: 139219
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
189 views
36 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #73 of 484 articles by views in journal of food measurement and characterization
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 484 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
After the deep solar minimum at the end of the solar cycle 23, a small magnetic storm
occurred on 20–26 January 2010. The Dst (disturbance storm time) index reached the minimum of −38 nT on 20 January and
the prolonged recovery that followed the main phase that lasted for about 6 days. In this study, we
concentrate on three substorms that took place (1) just prior to the storm, (2) during the
main phase of the storm, and (3) at the end of the recovery of the storm. We analyse the solar wind
conditions from the solar wind monitoring spacecraft, the duration and intensity of the substorm events
as well as the behaviour of the electrojet currents from the ground magnetometer measurements.
We compare the precipitation characteristics of the three substorms.
The results show that the F-region electron density enhancements and dominant green and red auroral emission of the substorm activity during the storm recovery resembles average isolated substorm precipitation. However, the energy dissipated, even at the very end of a prolonged storm recovery, is very large compared to the typical energy content of isolated substorms. In the case studied here, the dissipation of the excess energy is observed over a 3-h long period of several consecutive substorm intensifications. Our findings suggest that the substorm energy dissipation varies between the storm phases.
The results show that the F-region electron density enhancements and dominant green and red auroral emission of the substorm activity during the storm recovery resembles average isolated substorm precipitation. However, the energy dissipated, even at the very end of a prolonged storm recovery, is very large compared to the typical energy content of isolated substorms. In the case studied here, the dissipation of the excess energy is observed over a 3-h long period of several consecutive substorm intensifications. Our findings suggest that the substorm energy dissipation varies between the storm phases.
| Reference Key |
partamies2011annalessubstorms
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;N. Partamies;L. Juusola;E. Tanskanen;E. Tanskanen;K. Kauristie;J. M. Weygand;Y. Ogawa |
| Journal | journal of food measurement and characterization |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
10.5194/angeo-29-2031-2011
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.