Counter-Based and MUX-Based Design of DPLL, a Comparative Study
Clicks: 95
ID: 13890
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
56.5
/100
95 views
78 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #142 of 148 articles by views in adbu journal of engineering technology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 148 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The design of modern day communication system emphasizes on transmission and proper reception of data at minimum possible error rates and also at the same time on maintenance of high degrees of precision. But there are additional factors that add to it such as the operating speeds of the communication device developed should be compatible with the other sub-systems of the setup. Also, the design complexity of the device and the cost of design should be minimum. So, based on the various factors as mentioned above, a situation arises where a number of designs can be put forward for the same device having their sets of merits and demerits. As such, an analysis of these different designs is essential to derive an optimal solution which is the main objective of this work. Considering the various constraints at hand, we would like to put forward a comparative study between two different designs of the communication receiver device DPLL, namely the counter based DPLL and Multiplexer based DPLL design which brings to light the merits of one design over the other in terms of key parameters such as speed, design, complexity, hardware requirement etc. Keywords: Multiplexer, oscillator, detector, phase, recovery
| Reference Key |
bhattacharyya2016counterbasedadbu
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya;Ragib Nasir Ahmed;Ripunjoy Sarma;Roushan Saikia;Kaustubh Bhattacharyya; |
| Journal | adbu journal of engineering technology |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.