combined istent® inject trabecular micro-bypass and phacoemulsification in australian patients with open-angle glaucoma
Clicks: 278
ID: 138616
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
278 views
37 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #30 of 271 articles by views in e3s web of conferences
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 271 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Alon M Salby,1 Simon E Skalicky1,2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 2Glaucoma Unit, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaCorrespondence: Alon M Salby Email amicahmd@gmail.comPurpose: This retrospective audit aimed to evaluate the impact of combined iStent® Inject (iSI) and phacoemulsification on medication number in Australians with open-angle glaucoma. Secondary outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity, refraction and visual fields.Patients and Methods: Patients with glaucoma that received combined iSI and phacoemulsification by the same surgeon between 1 February 2016 and 1 February 2018 were audited for postoperative medication number, pressures after 1 day, 1 week, 4 weeks and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, visual acuity, refraction and visual fields. These parameters were compared to baseline levels and with those from a separate cohort of patients without glaucoma that received standalone phacoemulsification.Results: Forty-one patients (63 eyes) received the combined procedure. Thirty-four patients (59 eyes) received standalone phacoemulsification. Four weeks after receiving combined iSI and phacoemulsification the mean medication number was significantly reduced by 1.3 (p < 0.001) for those on medication at baseline and by 0.5 (p = 0.002) overall. Mean IOP was significantly reduced from baseline after 6 months (– 16%; p = 0.012; n = 35) and 12 months (– 29%; p = 0.004; n = 16). Patients receiving standalone phacoemulsification had short-term reductions in IOP at 4 weeks (– 8%; p < 0.001; n = 57) and 6 months (– 16%; p < 0.001; n = 32). These patients without glaucoma had lower pressures overall compared to those with glaucoma that received the combined procedure (p = 0.019). There were no differences in final visual acuity or refractive outcomes between groups.Conclusion: This audit suggests that iSI and phacoemulsification are at least as effective in controlling IOP as medical therapy. It may have an important role in reducing the medication burden in Australians with cataract and glaucoma. This study is one of the first to confirm refractive stability in concomitant iSI and phacoemulsification.Keywords: glaucoma, iStent Inject, micro-invasive glaucoma surgery, trabecular micro-bypass, phacoemulsification
| Reference Key |
am2020clinicalcombined
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Salby AM;Skalicky SE |
| Journal | e3s web of conferences |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.