magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of supratentorial tumours
Clicks: 353
ID: 137521
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
353 views
143 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #8 of 19 articles by views in hts teologiese studies/theological studies
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Supratentorial tumours mostly present with non-specific complaints such as
headache, stroke like syndrome or seizures. Often a diagnosis is made or
suggested initially by findings on imaging studies. We wanted to study the imaging
findings of supratentorial tumours, so as to deliver the best possible diagnosis and
treatment for the patient.
METHODS
All clinically suspected supratentorial brain tumour cases undergoing Magnetic
Resonance Imaging (MRI) at GSL Medical College and General Hospital,
Rajahmundry, were included in this study. All scans were performed with 1.5 Tesla
MRI. Pre-contrast scanning was done using axial T1, T2 and FLAIR; coronal T2
and sagittal T1 with a slice thickness of 5 mm. Post-contrast coronal, sagittal and
axial T1WI were obtained. If required, thinner sections were obtained in the region
of interest wherever necessary. Special MRI sequences like FLAIR (Fluid
Attenuated Inversion Recovery Sequence), and DWI (Diffusion Weighted Imaging)
were obtained.
RESULTS
In this study, 53 cases were diagnosed with supratentorial tumours. Glioma was
the most common diagnosis (49%). Peak incidence of neoplasms was seen in fifth
decade and the lowest incidence was seen in the first decade. 29 patients were
males and 24 patients were females. Headache was the commonest presenting
complaint. Twenty-three tumours were homogenous, 22 were heterogenous and
7 had non-enhancing pattern.
CONCLUSIONS
Multiplanar capability of MRI is helpful in identifying the precise anatomic location
and the exact extent of the tumours. Post contrast images clearly define the size,
margins, and nature of the tumour and also improves the differentiation between
the tumour and surrounding edema.
| Reference Key |
mohan2020journalmagnetic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Pottala Krishna Mohan;V. Mythri Priyadarshini;Anusha Rani Sambangi;K. Jaya Sudha |
| Journal | hts teologiese studies/theological studies |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.18410/jebmh/2020/139
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.