imaging of gout: findings and pitfalls. a pictorial review.
Clicks: 357
ID: 137506
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
6.0
/100
20 views
20 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Abstract
Gout is the most common crystal arthropathy, accounting for up to 5% of all arthritis. The hallmark of the disease is hyperuricemia with the subsequent deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in the intra- and extra-articular soft tissues and bones, leading to inflammation of these tissues. Recurrent intermittent flares can result in chronic gouty arthritis leading to cartilage and bone destruction. The most sensitive and specific imaging methods for diagnosing acute gout are ultrasound and dual energy computed tomography (DECT). In the chronic or tophaceous gout, imaging may depict tophi and their local destructive effect on surrounding tissues with characteristic findings on radiographs. In this pictorial review the imaging features of acute and chronic gout on radiographs, ultrasound, and DECT are presented, as well as imaging pitfalls that one needs to be aware.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (133 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
sudo-szopiska12020actaimaging
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska1;P. Diana Afonso;Jon A. Jacobson;James Teh |
| Journal | asia-pacific journal of financial studies |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.