which matrices show perfect nestedness or the absence of nestedness? an analytical study on the performance of nodf and wnodf
Clicks: 268
ID: 136728
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
268 views
52 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Nestedness is a concept employed to describe a particular pattern of organization in species interaction networks and in site-by-species incidence matrices. Currently the most widely used nestedness index is the NODF (Nestedness metric based on Overlap and Decreasing Fill), initially presented for binary data and later extended to quantitative data, WNODF. In this manuscript we present a rigorous formulation of this index for both cases, NODF and WNODF. In addition, we characterize the matrices corresponding to the two extreme cases, (W)NODF=1 and (W)NODF=0, representing a perfectly nested pattern andthe absence of nestedness respectively. After permutations of rows and columns if necessary, the perfectly nested pattern is a full triangular matrix, which must of course besquare, with additional inequalities between the elements for WNODF. On the other hand there are many patterns characterized by the total absence of nestedness. Indeed, any binary matrix (whether square or rectangular) with uniform row and column sums (or marginals) satisfies this condition: the chessboard and a pattern reflecting an underlying annular ecological gradient, which we shall call gradient-like, are symmetrical or nearly symmetrical examples from this class.
| Reference Key |
britton2016biomathwhich
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Nicholas Britton;Mario Almeida Neto;Gilberto Corso |
| Journal | biomath |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.11145/j.biomath.2015.12.171
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.