acknowledgement to reviewers of computers in 2015
Clicks: 204
ID: 134565
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
204 views
23 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #18 of 20 articles by views in infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The editors of Computers would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2015. [...]
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (19 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
office2016computersacknowledgement
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Computers Editorial Office |
| Journal | infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.3390/computers5010002
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.