the impact of central corneal thickness on values of intraocular pressure measured using two methods: goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in patients with open-angle glaucoma

Clicks: 256
ID: 134113
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Introduction Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) is a contact, non-applanation method for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP). Objektive The study aimed at evaluating the impact of central corneal thickness (CCT) on values of IOP measured using two methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and DCT. Methods The study included 150 patients (300 eyes) with the diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma (54 males) and mean age of 59.39± 13.12 years. IOP was measured using two methods: GAT and DCT. CCT was measured (ultrasound pachymetry). DCT introduced a new value - the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA). Results The IOP measured with the GAT was lower compared to the IOP measured with DCT (17.71±3.35mmHg vs 19.80± 3.67mmHg). There was a significant positive correlation between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT (r= 0.867, p< 0.01). In all patients, there was a significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with GAT (r=0.198, p< 0.01), as well as between CCT and IOP measured with DCT (r=0.180, p< 0.05). With every 10mm of change in CCT, the change of IOP measured with GAT was 0.3mmHg, while the average change of IOP measured with DCT was 0.4 mmHg. There was a significant positive correlation between CCT and OPA (r=0.204, p< 0.01). There was also a significant positive correlation between OPA and IOP measured with GAT (r= 0.393, p< 0.01) and between OPA and IOP measured with DCT (r= 0.452, p< 0.01). Conclusion IOP measured with GAT was lower than IOP measured with DCT. CCT had impact on both methods: GAT and DCT. The impact of CCT on IOP (DCT) was lower compared to the impact of CCT on IOP(GAT).
Reference Key
elena2020halothe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Jordanova Elena;Hentova-Senćanić Paraskeva;Marjanović Ivan;Senćanić Ivan;Stefanović Ivana;Baralić Marko
Journal halo 194
Year 2020
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.