a review of the meta-analytic studies of reliability generalization - una revisión de los estudios meta-analíticos de generalización de la fiabilidad

Clicks: 344
ID: 133999
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #8 of 19 articles by views in mehran university research journal of engineering and technology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The meta-analytic approach of reliabilitygeneralization (RG) pretends to show that reliability is anempirical property that varies from one test application toanother. This recent meta-analytic approach is helping tomake the researchers aware of the importance of reportingreliability estimates obtained from the own data and, ofavoiding the malpractice of inducting reliability coefficientsfrom other studies and previous applications of thetest. The stages to carry out an RG study are presented: (a)formulating the problem, (b) searching for the studies, (c)coding studies, and (d) statistical analysis and interpretation.An updated overview of the statistical problems ofthis approach is also offered: (a) to transform versus not totransform the reliability coefficients, (b) to weight versusnot to weight the coefficients, and (d) which statisticalmodel is the most appropriate (fixed-, random-, andmixed-effects). A systematic review of the 49 RG studiespublished to date is presented with the purpose of analyzingthe heterogeneity in how the data are statisticallyanalyzed. Finally, the implications of the RG studies forresearch and professional practice are discussed.
Reference Key
snchez-meca2008escritosa Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Julio Sánchez-Meca;José A. López Pina;José A. López López
Journal mehran university research journal of engineering and technology
Year 2008
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.