l’attendibilità di pausania. il caso di delfi
Clicks: 171
ID: 133275
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
171 views
28 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #5 of 5 articles by views in bucharest working papers in linguistics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Pausanias’s periegesis is the touchstone of humanism in the recovery of Greece. It had a definite impact on the perception of Greece in Western Europe during the Renaissance and the Enlightenment. Today all antiquity experts recognize the decisive contribution of Pausanias’s itinerary to the reconstruction and documentation of the monumental topography of ancient Greece. However, such an axiomatic position has caused many objections in earlier times, when many scholars doubted his sincerity (e.g. Wilamowitz), or his reliability. The excavations at the sanctuary of Delphi and accompanying research gave new life to many of the votives Pausanias saw and tend in many cases to justify the reliability of his text. At the same time, however, comparison of the periegetes words to the archaeological remains raised many problems, such as the identification of the offering by the citizens of Tegea, or the interminable discussion concerning whether the Treasury of the Athenians was built just before, or after the battle of Marathon. The unexpected identification of a series of sculptures with the statues from the two pediments of the 4th century Temple of Apollo in the recent years and the important reconstruction of their representations exactly as Pausanias described them, allows today the periegetes to have the final word over his older censors.
| Reference Key |
kolonia2009lanxlattendibilit
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Rosina Kolonia |
| Journal | bucharest working papers in linguistics |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.13130/2035-4797/370
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.