randomized double-blind trial of the effects of humidified compared with nonhumidified low flow oxygen therapy on the symptoms of patients
Clicks: 97
ID: 133155
1997
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
28.8
/100
97 views
10 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #120 of 165 articles by views in religions
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 165 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of humidified versus nonhumidified low flow oxygen therapy on the subjective symptoms of patients.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (19 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
andres1997canadianrandomized
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Darcy Andres;Norma Thurston;Rollin Brant;Ward Flemons;Doreen Fofonoff;Ardis Ruttimann;Sandra Sveinson;Carol Neil |
| Journal | religions |
| Year | 1997 |
| DOI |
10.1155/1997/296763
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.