liberalism without perfection: replies to lister, kulenović, zoffoli, zelić, and baccarini
Clicks: 93
ID: 132944
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
27.6
/100
93 views
11 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #75 of 87 articles by views in Plants (Basel, Switzerland)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
I would like to begin by thanking all the contributors to this symposium,
especially Elvio Baccarini, who hosted the conference at the University of
Rijeka where several of the papers in this symposium were initially
presented. I’ve learned a great deal from these essays, and I’m very
fortunate for my work to be the subject of such careful and perceptive
philosophical attention. Below I offer some replies to each contributor,
though I do not address all the important points raised in each paper.
| Reference Key |
jonathan2014filozofijaliberalism
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Quong Jonathan |
| Journal | Plants (Basel, Switzerland) |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.2298/FID1401096Q
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.