women in caesar, sallust and the caesarian writers’ action and narration

Clicks: 29
ID: 132160
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Tacitus and other authors of imperial age ignored or denigrated women roles in their books. But this was done because of political or moral reasons, not due to reality. Today it is hard to support their opinions. Only from an understanding view of the important role of women in Roman society, both republican and imperial one, it is possible to study mentions of women in literature or historiography. This kind of studies, as they have been already realized about imperial age sources, must be done as well with republican period sources, in order to establish continuities, precedents or disparities in the treatment of woman question in Rome. In this article, we would start with Caesar, following with the authors of the so-called «Corpus Caesarianum», and finishing with Sallust.
Reference Key
posadas2012studiawomen Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;EdicJuan Luisiones POSADAS
Journal studia historica: historia antigua
Year 2012
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.