a comparison of osteoblast and osteoclast in vitro co-culture models and their translation for preclinical drug testing applications
Clicks: 251
ID: 131947
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
78.6
/100
245 views
201 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
As the population of western societies on average ages, the number of people affected by bone remodeling-associated diseases such as osteoporosis continues to increase. The development of new therapeutics is hampered by the high failure rates of drug candidates during clinical testing, which is in part due to the poor predictive character of animal models during preclinical drug testing. Co-culture models of osteoblasts and osteoclasts offer an alternative to animal testing and are considered to have the potential to improve drug development processes in the future. However, a robust, scalable, and reproducible 3D model combining osteoblasts and osteoclasts for preclinical drug testing purposes has not been developed to date. Here we review various types of osteoblast−osteoclast co-culture models and outline the remaining obstacles that must be overcome for their successful translation.
| Reference Key |
sieberath2020internationala
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Alexander Sieberath;Elena Della Bella;Ana Marina Ferreira;Piergiorgio Gentile;David Eglin;Kenny Dalgarno |
| Journal | Intertax |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.3390/ijms21030912
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.