a divided catholic republic? the inherited ecclesiological dispute and rampant liberalism in the independence of mexico
Clicks: 320
ID: 131806
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
320 views
43 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #4 of 199 articles by views in vision research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 199 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The Independence of Mexico found a country furrowed by religious divisions which became immediately noticeable in the republic created in 1824. The 1826 Senate report on the Real Patronato expressed the prevailing tensions and the different disturbing facets they presented to a Catholic state. The controversy had many dimensions, both domestic and international, and revealed the existence of an intense ecclesiologic debate bringing together thinkers and politicians from both sides of the Atlantic. This paper mainly underlines the role played by the failure of Spain’s liberal Triennium (1820-1823) and Spanish critics to stir up Mexican perception of the dangers that the Catholic hierarchy and the Holy See represented for a Catholic state. The author suggests the need to consider how this confrontation, handled with amazing self-assurance by Mexican ecclesiastical authorities, resulted directly from the tense relations between the Spanish monarchy and the Vatican throughout the eighteenth century.
| Reference Key |
connaughton2010historiaa
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Brian Connaughton |
| Journal | vision research |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.