randomised controlled study comparing a 0.75% ropivacaine to a conventional dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarian section by epidural analgesia
Clicks: 343
ID: 131628
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
62.9
/100
343 views
223 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #9 of 19 articles by views in hts teologiese studies/theological studies
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Central neuraxial
blocked is one of the safest and efficacious methods of
anaesthesia and analgesia. It has the added advantage of prolonged pain relief into the
postoperative period. Epidural analgesia has increased steadily in popularity when compared to
spinal anaesthes
ia due to its neurological consequences and improved post
-
operative analgesia
with epidural Opioids and as a consequence decreased side effects and prolonged the duration of
analgesia. Present study is undertaken to compare hemodynamic and analgesic charac
teristics
using a 0.75% ropivacaine to a conventional dose of 0.5% bupivacaine for cesarean section
under epidural anaesthesia. This study was conducted in ASA Grade I 50 singleton parturient to
compare hemodynamics, APGAR scores and analgesic characterist
ics of ropivacaine and
bupivacaine. We have observed that the onset of sensory blockade was slower with ropivacaine
and the duration of sensory blockade was also less. Whereas there was no significant change in
haemodynamics and APGAR scores with both the
drugs.
| Reference Key |
2015journalrandomised
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Porika ;Suresh Chander ; Rajeshwari |
| Journal | hts teologiese studies/theological studies |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10. 18410 /je bmh /2015/ 839
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.