a criatividade lexical no discurso literário

Clicks: 308
ID: 130102
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #7 of 16 articles by views in emerging microbes & infections

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Based on the works of Ieda Maria Alves (1990), Maria Aparecida Barbosa (2001), Margarida Basílio (2006), Nilce Sant’ Anna Martins (2001, 2003), Edith Pimentel Pinto (1994), Dino Preti (2000) and Luiz Carlos de Assis Rocha (1998) about neologisms, word formation and the relation between these processes and literature, this paper analyzes the way authors use language to build their texts.  Being more specific, the objective here is to observe, in some texts written by Guimarães Rosa, Luiz Ruffato e Luis Fernando Verissimo, the preferential word formation process, namely derivation, compounding and semantic neologism, used by them and try to establish relations between the preference given to each of the processes and the literary project of these authors.
Reference Key
silva2013entrepalavras:a Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Alba Valéria Tinoco Alves Silva
Journal emerging microbes & infections
Year 2013
DOI
10.22168/2237-6321.3.3.2 esp.8-24
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.