intracoelomic pressure and coelomic perfusion pressure in healthy tegus (salvator merianae)
Clicks: 81
ID: 129610
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
24.0
/100
81 views
19 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #406 of 436 articles by views in Trials
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 436 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The evaluation of intracoelomic pressure is very important, as many diseases can culminate with an increase in intracoelomic pressure and a consequent reduction in perfusion of the abdominal organs. The aim of this study was to measure the intracoelomic pressure and coelomic perfusion pressure in tegus (Salvator merianae). Twelve healthy tegus without sexual distinctions, weighing 1.64±0.39kg, were enrolled in this study. Intracoelomic pressure was measured using two methods: a handmade water column system and a pressure transducer connected to a multiparameter monitor. Coelomic perfusion pressure was determined by subtracting the intracoelomic pressure from the mean arterial pressure, which was measured using an oscillometric method. Intracoelomic pressure was 0mmHg (range, 0 - 0.5) according to the water column method and 2mmHg (range, 0 - 2.0) according to the pressure transducer. Coelomic perfusion pressure was 76mmHg (range, 62 - 105) according to the water column system and 82mmHg (range, 57 - 93) according to the pressure transducer. No significant difference was observed between the values obtained by the different measurement methods. Intracoelomic pressure value reported in this study might be useful in tegus, but the coelomic perfusion pressure should be used with caution, considering the blood pressure method that was used.
| Reference Key |
silva2018cinciaintracoelomic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;André Nicolai Elias da Silva;Thais Feres Bressan;Adriano Bonfim Carregaro |
| Journal | Trials |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20170286
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.