criopreservação de sêmen humano: comparação entre métodos de congelação e tipos de envase cryopreservation of human semen: comparison between methods of freezing and types of storage

Clicks: 433
ID: 129318
2006
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #13 of 101 articles by views in 2018 international conference on information technologies, infotech 2018 - proceedings

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
OBJETIVOS: comparar duas diferentes técnicas de congelação e dois tipos de envase do sêmen humano durante processo de criopreservação. MÉTODOS: estudo experimental, no qual foi analisada a criopreservação de 18 amostras de sêmen de 18 voluntários. Após a adição de meio crioprotetor, "Test-yolk buffer" , as amostras de sêmen foram envasadas em palhetas com capacidade de 0,25 mL ou em criotubos de 2 mL e submetidas à criopreservação por dois métodos, um lento e outro rápido, totalizando quatro tratamentos distintos: RP (congelação pelo método rápido e envasado em palheta), RT (rápido-criotubo), LP (lento-palheta) e LT (lento-criotubo). As amostras, após 24 horas, foram descongeladas em temperatura ambiente e mantidas a 37ºC. Os dados coletados foram analisados através do teste t de Student, com p<0,05, utilizando o programa de computador SPSS for Windows® versão 11.0.0. RESULTADOS: houve redução da motilidade espermática após o processo de criopreservação. A taxa de motilidade inicial foi 58,1% e as motilidades após os diferentes métodos de criopreservação foram: 19,2% (RP), 27% (RT), 21,1% (LP) e 30,3% (LT). Houve redução significativa na morfologia normal. A taxa de morfologia normal inicial foi 14,2% e as morfologias após os diferentes métodos de criopreservação foram: 12,8% (RP), 12,6% (RT), 12,6% (LP) e 12,4% (LT). CONCLUSÕES: o método de criopreservação lento com envase em criotubo esteve associado à melhor motilidade espermática após o descongelamento. Não houve diferença entre os métodos quando avaliada a morfologia espermática.
PURPOSE: to compare two different methods of freezing and two types of human semen storage during cryopreservation process. METHODS: experimental research in which the cryopreservation of 18 semen samples from 18 volunteers was studied. Following the addition of the cryoprotectant medium, Test-yolk buffer, the semen samples were packaged into 0.25 mL straws or into 2 mL cryotubes and submitted to cryopreservation by slow or rapid methods, in four different treatments: RS (cryopreservation by rapid method and packaged in straws), RT (rapid-cryotubes), SS (slow-straws), and ST (slow-cryotubes). Samples were thawed after 24 hand then maintained at 37ºC. Data collected were analyzed by the Student t-test, with p<0.05, using the SPSS computer program for Windows®, version 11.0.0. RESULTS: the motility of spermatozoa decreased after the cryopreservation process. The initial motility rate was 58.1% and motilities after the different methods of cryopreservation were 19.2% (RS), 27% (RT), 21.1% (SS) and 30.3% (ST). There was a significant decrease of the normal morphology. The initial normal morphology was 14.2% and morphologies after the different methods of cryopreservation were 12.8% (RS), 12.6% (RT), 12.6% (SS) and 12.4% (ST). CONCLUSIONS: the slow method of cryopreservation with storage in cryotubes showed the best recovery of motile cells after freezing and thawing. There was no difference among the methods when appraised the morphology.
Reference Key
cavalcante2006revistacriopreservao Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Marcelo Borges Cavalcante;Ana Beatriz Graça Duarte;Danielle Oliveira de Araújo;Eugênio Pacelli de Barreto Teles
Journal 2018 international conference on information technologies, infotech 2018 - proceedings
Year 2006
DOI
10.1590/S0100-72032006001200004
URL
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032006001200004
Keywords
spermatozoa semen reproduction cryopreservation espermatozoides

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.