review: heiko holweg (2004). methodologie der qualitativen sozialforschung: eine kritik [methodology of qualitative social research: a critique]

Clicks: 199
ID: 128793
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #557 of 729 articles by views in molecules

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 729 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The author contributes to the debate on the value of qualitative and quantitative social research methods. Taking sides with the latter and arguing for a critical rationalist approach, he points out the existence of deductively derived laws and causal explanations. To him, there is no necessity to deny such conclusions just because human beings are all individual. Most papers on this subject conclude that both approaches, qualitative and quantitative, could reinforce each other by sharing tools and methods. The author, however, sticks to the refutation of his opponent's arguments in a somewhat glib manner, and no further development of the topic is delivered. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0801155
Reference Key
catn2008forum:review: Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Matthias Catón;Henrik Schober
Journal molecules
Year 2008
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.