policies for projectification: support, avoid or let it be? poliitika projektistumise suhtes: toetada, tõrjuda või lasta juhtuda?
Clicks: 172
ID: 128701
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
5.1
/100
17 views
17 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The importance of temporary activities is growing and projects are proliferating in
most businesses, non-profit and public organisations. This trend has been treated by
different authors and on different levels – organisational, societal and personal, but
mainly on a single level – and under different labels (projectization, projectification,
project orientation etc.). As the integral picture is still almost missing, the article is
aimed to fill this gap, showing that the levels of projectification are distinguishable,
but tightly interconnected. Another aim is to uncover the subtopic of the extent of
projectization (and/or projectification) and the appropriate policies and strategies. In
this aspect the main issue is the balance between the temporary and the permanent,
and the defence of permanency in the world of proliferating temporary settings
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (124 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
kuura2012eestipolicies
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Arvi Kuura |
| Journal | eesti majanduspoliitilised väitlused |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
10.15157/tpep.v19i1.431
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.