policies for projectification: support, avoid or let it be? poliitika projektistumise suhtes: toetada, tõrjuda või lasta juhtuda?

Clicks: 172
ID: 128701
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The importance of temporary activities is growing and projects are proliferating in most businesses, non-profit and public organisations. This trend has been treated by different authors and on different levels – organisational, societal and personal, but mainly on a single level – and under different labels (projectization, projectification, project orientation etc.). As the integral picture is still almost missing, the article is aimed to fill this gap, showing that the levels of projectification are distinguishable, but tightly interconnected. Another aim is to uncover the subtopic of the extent of projectization (and/or projectification) and the appropriate policies and strategies. In this aspect the main issue is the balance between the temporary and the permanent, and the defence of permanency in the world of proliferating temporary settings
Reference Key
kuura2012eestipolicies Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Arvi Kuura
Journal eesti majanduspoliitilised väitlused
Year 2012
DOI
10.15157/tpep.v19i1.431
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.