cuba y bolivia: dos procesos distintos, ¿una sola revolución verdadera?

Clicks: 241
ID: 128698
2011
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #13 of 30 articles by views in biological reviews

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This article claims that the Bolivian revolutionary process of 2000-2005 did not follow on the steps of the Cuban Revolution's strategy. The sheer strength and autonomy of its social mobilization, the absence of a maximum leader, and the meshing of democratic elections with mass mobilization have given a turn of the screw on revolutionary strategy in Latin America, producing stable majorities through a lock-in process, whose ultimate outcome has not been the assault on state power. The emergence of a dictator and a unique party in Cuba, and their absence in Bolivia, are explained by the size of their autonomous sociabilities: very large in Bolivia, and very weak in Cuba.
Reference Key
salazar2011colombiacuba Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Boris Salazar
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal biological reviews
Year 2011
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://colombiainternacional.uniandes.edu.co/view.php/9069/index.php?id=9069
Keywords
revolution • stable majorities • war 'revolutionary paths • lock-in

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.