Wastewater treatment using oxygenic photogranule-based process has lower environmental impact than conventional activated sludge process.

Clicks: 286
ID: 128078
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #115 of 274 articles by views in Bioresource technology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 274 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology was applied to assess the environmental feasibility of a novel wastewater treatment technology based on oxygenic photogranules (OPG) biomass in comparison to a conventional activated sludge (CAS) system. LCA using laboratory scale experimental data allowed for eco-design of the process during the early stage of process development at laboratory scale. Electricity consumption related to artificial lighting, the fate of the generated biomass (renewable energy and replacement of mineral fertilizer), and the nitrogen flows in the OPG system were identified as major contributors to the potential environmental impact of the OPG treatment system. These factors require optimization in order to reduce the environmental impact of the overall OPG system. Nonetheless, the environmental impact of a non-optimized OPG scenario was generally lower than for a CAS reference system. With an optimization of the artificial lighting system, an energy neutral treatment system may be within reach.
Reference Key
brockmann2020wastewaterbioresource Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Brockmann, Doris;Gérand, Yves;Park, Chul;Milferstedt, Kim;Hélias, Arnaud;Hamelin, Jérôme;
Journal Bioresource technology
Year 2020
DOI
S0960-8524(20)31478-4
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.