Patient-reported outcomes and biochemical alterations during hormonal therapy in men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism who have finished infertility treatment.

Clicks: 345
ID: 127933
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 3 articles by views in endocrine journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (MHH) is effectively treated by gonadotropins with a high rate of ejaculate sperm and paternity; however, there is no information regarding the appropriate management, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs), of men with MHH who have finished infertility treatment. To compare health-related quality of life, erectile function and biochemical alterations in men with MHH who were treated with testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Twenty-six MHH patients (mean age: 34 years) who needed to improve their androgen deficiency symptoms underwent either hCG therapy (n = 16, started with self-injection of 2,000-7,500 IU per week) or TRT (n = 10, testosterone enanthate 250 mg every 3 weeks). The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire, five-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and hormonal and biochemical analyses were assessed every 3 months. Changes and comparison of each treatment regarding these parameters were analyzed. Both hCG and TRT significantly improved all domains of the SF-36, except for bodily pain and social functioning. hCG significantly improved the general and mental health domains compared with TRT. Significant improvements in IIEF-5 were observed with both treatments, showing significant improvement with hCG compared to TRT. TRT caused progressive testicular atrophy. There were significant decreases in waist circumference and triglycerides in both treatment groups and significant elevations in prostate-specific antigen and hematocrit. Both hCG and TRT are effective and safe, with preferable PROs by hCG, for treating androgen deficiency in men with MHH who do not need infertility treatment.
Reference Key
shiraishi2020patientreportedendocrine Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Shiraishi, Koji;Ohmi, Chietaka;Matsuyama, Hideyasu;
Journal endocrine journal
Year 2020
DOI
10.1507/endocrj.EJ20-0365
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.